Christian Porter has insisted someone in one of the two government departments responsible for the robo-debt scheme assured him it was legal, but he can’t recall who. The former Social Services minister and attorney-general told the inquiry he could not be sure who provided the legal assurance, but he was sure he had asked about it (The Guardian). “I can’t recall who it was that affirmed that assurance, but someone did, and I recall that it was a departmental person,” Porter said. Porter also admitted he gave “inaccurate” and “untrue” information to the media while defending the scheme in late 2016 and early 2017, which he blamed on the talking points he was provided for media interviews (ABC). Porter told the commission he takes responsibility for the failed scheme, saying he wished he had taken “the next step of inquiry”. Earlier in the day, former minister Alan Tudge continued his testimony, where he was grilled on a document that showed Tudge’s chief of staff wrote to the Department of Human Services in January 2017 asking how much money the budget could save by having debt notices calculated manually, rather than through automated systems (Michael West Media). |